Claude Certified Developer (CCDV-F) Complete Exam Prep by Vivek Amilkanthawar

Every question asks one of four developer decisions. All 25 skills at the guide's weights, two timed mocks, a verdict.
What you'll learn

---

Read any CCDV-F item as one of four developer decisions: what runs, how it calls Claude, what Claude sees and says, and whether it survives production.
Apply the constraint rule: find the stem's binding constraint, pick the mechanism built for it, and strike every option that turns a generic knob.
Apply the guarantee rule: when a stem says must or never, advice is a distractor and only an enforcing mechanism can be the credited answer.
Call Claude properly: the Messages API, streaming, vision, extended thinking, caching, and when the Batch API beats realtime.
Design what Claude sees and says: prompts, context engineering, structured output, application surfaces, and configuration three engineers can share.
Choose between workflow and agent, and build tools, MCP servers, and agent loops the way the exam scores them.
Own the quarter that is not about Claude: requirements, the systems life cycle, and software engineering discipline at exam depth.
Sit two timed 53-question mocks tagged by domain and by decision, and finish with a readiness verdict that names the lectures to rewatch.
Requirements

---

You write software. The official guide's intended candidate has one to five years of software engineering experience and about six months hands-on with Claude or comparable LLM systems.
No specific stack is assumed beyond that. The guide recommends Python and/or TypeScript and fluency with REST APIs and CLI tools; the course teaches to the published skill statements, not to one codebase.
Read the official exam guide once yourself. This course teaches the material; the guide is the authoritative reference.
Description

---

The Claude Certified Developer Foundations (CCDV-F) exam does not reward recall. It hands you a scenario, a support desk that must answer ten thousand tickets by morning, a dashboard that chokes on prose, a ticket with hidden instructions, and asks you to make a developer's decision.
Every item on it asks one of four decisions. What runs. How does it call Claude. What does Claude see and say. Will it survive production. The quarters are real: computed from the skill weights in the current official exam guide, each decision covers roughly a quarter of the 53 items. The course stamps the decision on every worked question, so by the end you read stems the way the item writers built them.
Two elimination rules do the rest, and both are extracted from the official sample rationales rather than invented. The constraint rule: every stem names its binding constraint, cost, overnight, reuse, untrusted input, and the credited answer is the mechanism built for exactly that constraint. Any option that turns a generic knob, temperature, max_tokens, a bigger model, one more line in the prompt, is a distractor. The guarantee rule: when a stem says must, never, always or cannot, guidance loses to mechanism. A polite system-prompt line is advice. A hook that blocks the action, or a schema the output is validated against: that is enforcement. All three published sample questions fall to one of these two rules.
Roughly a quarter of this exam is not about Claude's API at all. Requirements

---

, the systems life cycle, software engineering discipline, configuration management. It is the least marketed fact about the exam and it is where candidates who only studied the API lose points. A full lecture owns the core of it, and the mocks weight it the way the blueprint does.
The course is a running build. One customer support desk gets built on screen across seventeen lectures, from a single API call to an agent that survives untrusted input. Each lecture is the moment the system hits something it cannot do, and the exam skill is the decision that resolves it. All 25 skill statements in the current guide are covered, across all eight scored domains, at the guide's published weights.
Then the course tells you where you stand. Two timed 53-question mocks, matched to the blueprint at skill level, every item tagged twice: by domain and by which of the four decisions it tests. Your score comes back on both axes, so a weak area sends you to specific lectures instead of a vague "study more". A downloadable cheat sheet carries every number that can change, fee, time limit, cut score, validity, so the facts you memorize stay current even when the program moves.
What the exam itself looks like, per the current official guide: 53 items in 120 minutes, multiple-choice and multiple-response, with each item stating how many responses to select. Scoring is scaled 100 to 1,000 and 720 passes. The fee is 125 USD per attempt and the credential is valid for 12 months.
One access rule to know before you spend anything. Registration and scheduling run through the Anthropic Partner Academy and Pearson VUE, and access currently requires an organization in Anthropic's partner network; joining the network at its entry tier is free of charge for an organization. Check the current registration page before you schedule.
This is the developer track, for people who build, integrate, and ship applications on Claude's API, agents, and tooling. If you use Claude at work without building on it, the associate track tests that instead.
AI-use disclosure: AI tools were used in the production of this course, including the on-screen animation system and parts of the research and production workflow. The instructor designed the curriculum, verified every exam fact against the current official exam guide, and reviewed every lecture before publishing.
If you are sitting a different exam in this program, the other courses in this series are Claude Certified Associate (CCAO-F), Claude Certified Architect Foundations (CCAR-F), and Claude Certified Architect Professional (CCAR-P).
Who this course is for

---

Developers and engineers sitting the Claude Certified Developer Foundations (CCDV-F) exam.
People building on Claude's API, Claude Code, MCP, and agents who want the decision vocabulary the exam tests.
Candidates who prepared from API docs alone, since roughly a quarter of the exam is software engineering discipline and this course covers it at blueprint weight.
Not business users of Claude, and not roles limited to prompt writing. The guide excludes both; the associate track tests that audience instead.
Homepage

---